STRAIN YOUR
BRAIN!
By Neil James
Hudson
As I
navigated my way through the campus, I wondered again
what on earth Professor Stendahl could possibly want
with me. I wandered past crowds of young people, most
laughing, one crying, several campaigning for the
forthcoming election as if they themselves were
standing, and not a few with a copy of Strain Your
Brain! which suggested that the Professor was
something of a local hero on campus. I suspected that
brains would be better strained if the students actually
resorted to studying, and I wondered how far Stendahl’s
project reflected attitudes in the education system in
general. Greater intelligence was now seen as a right,
and indeed a capacity that everyone possessed: those
who clearly weren’t in its possession could blame it on
upbringing and a lack of opportunity. But on the other
hand, it was a refreshingly multicultural society, and
for a few seconds my cynical defences were breached by a
small hope for the future.
I asked a
randomly selected specimen for directions: she was
considerably more helpful than the receptionist had
been, and I soon found myself in the Professor’s
office. He seemed a likeable fellow, thoughtful but a
little absent-minded. I thought he looked like a
physicist rather than a psychologist, but perhaps that
was just because he bore a slight resemblance to
Einstein.
“I expect my
review wasn’t as complimentary as you’d hoped,” I said,
trying not to apologise.
The
Professor waved, as if my apology were a bad smell in
front of his face. “On the contrary, I found it very
intelligent. I think that’s more important than
sycophancy, don’t you?”
“I have a
duty to my readers to be fair,” I said.
In fact, I’d
only troubled myself with Strain Your Brain! in
the first place in order to avoid writing about the
election. I didn’t want to deteriorate into cynicism,
but those two self-important over-privileged businessmen
just reminded me of blind men in the desert arguing over
who should drive. And the commentary and analysis that
we journalists were providing was just drivel. We
deconstructed promises that we knew would never be kept,
and used the tiniest evidence to predict the election
result. There was one story that Stratton availed
himself of a photo-opportunity in a café, and that when
he left, his staff removed the cup from the premises.
It was speculated that they didn’t want him to leave a
DNA sample. In fact, it was to stop us from reading the
tea-leaves.
So Professor
Stendahl’s Strain Your Brain! was a welcome
distraction for me. By coincidence, my review of the
program was printed next to a story of John Stratton
playing the same game, another daft opportunity for
irrelevant publicity.
I was fairly even-minded, I think. The Professor had
decided, on the basis of ambiguous scientific evidence,
that solving a series of puzzles would increase your
IQ. I found it more interesting than I expected, and
more difficult--once the program established my ability,
it operated at a level that genuinely challenged me.
However, ultimately I wasn’t impressed. I felt that one
could equally raise one’s intelligence merely by
refusing to live such a stupid lifestyle in the first
place. I said this in my review, and imagined that
it wasn’t
what the Professor wanted.
His desk was
absurdly clear: I was always suspicious of an ordered
mind. But one object sat alone in the middle of the
space, and he now pushed it over to me. “The sequel,”
he said. “Perhaps you’d care to try it.”
I picked up
the machine and studied it. “I hope you’re aware,” I
said, “that my review will be, once again, scrupulously
honest.” He just smiled at me, apparently expecting me
to be more impressed this time.
This version
seemed to comprise a different selection of games.
Previously it had resembled IQ test questions, which
I’ve always found dull, but dressed up in a more
engrossing and dynamic manner. These puzzles seemed to
be more standard types, of the sort that you get in
tabloid newspapers and downmarket women’s magazines.
“I don’t do
word searches,” I said.
The
Professor smiled at me. “Have you ever had your IQ
tested?” he asked.
I nodded.
“When I was a student, I found out I had an IQ of 157,”
I said. “After that, I always tried to keep 158 dollars
in the bank, so I could say I had more money than
sense.” I looked up, and realised that Professor
Stendahl was a man who smiled at everything and laughed
at nothing.
“Give it a
go,” he said. “I promise you you’ll notice the change.”
So sitting
in the office of a Professor of Psychology, I did a word
search, trying to identify different breeds of dog in a
grid of letters. It was harder than I’d expected,
possibly through the choice of unused letters. I felt
slightly humiliated as I struggled with his problem, but
I finished it in the end.
“Take it
away with you,” he said. “Keep working at it. I
promise you you’ll notice the change in no time.”
Was he
right? It seemed unlikely, but I felt as if I’d
strained my brain cells so much that something must have
happened. And when I walked out of the campus, things
seemed different. I didn’t know if the atmosphere had
changed, or if I could perceive things better. But now
I was suspicious of people, as if the racial mix were
really a powder keg that could explode at any moment. I
could only assume I was picking up subtle signals that I
hadn’t noticed before. The Professor’s game was
working.
***
At home I
flopped down on the sofa and put the news on. Election
again, dull dull dull. Stratton was delivering an
important new speech--that’s how they described it
anyway.
“Let’s
isolate the key issue here,” he said. “Let’s not think
in terms of races. Let’s think of it in terms of reds
and blues. Imagine a grid full of red squares, with a
few blue squares in it. So long as there are only a few
blue squares, there’s no problem. But as the blue
squares increase, they tend to form large shapes: while
the red squares find themselves increasingly at a
disadvantage. The larger the shapes, the easier it is
to grow: while some of them just turn yellow ...”
What on
earth was he going on about? With a start, I remembered
the first edition of Strain Your Brain! Blues
And Reds was a tricky exercise in which you had move the
squares around to stop the blue squares taking over.
Now Stratton was using it as a metaphor for racial
harmony. Wasn’t that taking it too far?
I took out
the first edition of Strain Your Brain!, fired it
up and started the Blues And Reds game. After the
second edition though, it just seemed silly. I knew
that I could win the game, so it didn’t seem worth
wasting the time.
Instead I
called John Stratton’s press office.
***
To my
surprise, someone agreed to meet me in person to discuss
Stratton’s relationship with the game. It must have
been one of his most junior staff, mind--a blonde woman,
still in her twenties. I suspected that Stratton had
hired her for other reasons than a proven track record
in public relations.
I decided to
research this later. So far, there were no rumours
about Stratton’s love life, but he was bound to slip up
sooner or later.
“So, I
gather you’ve been straining your brain,” she said.
“And so has
Mr John Stratton,” I replied. “I found it an odd thing
for him to be doing in the middle of an election
campaign. Isn’t he busy enough already?”
She smiled,
although it was more like shrugging with her mouth. “I
don’t think anyone’s too busy to improve themselves.
Surely you’ve noticed an improvement?”
“I’ve got to
admit, I do feel cleverer than I did a couple of days
ago,” I said. “But what’s in it for Stratton?”
I wasn’t
sure myself why I thought it mattered. I just had an
intuition that I was chasing a real story, that there
was something at the back of this that was worth my
time. Was this proof of my increasing intelligence?
She began to
speak as if she was quoting from some prepared press
release. “John Stratton simply believes that a more
intelligent population will be an enormous asset in the
twenty-first century. Any help that Professor Stendahl
can give will be a boon to business, and will vastly
increase the quality of life in this country. And
remember, if the public are to help us fight back
against the new threats we’re facing, they need to be
exceptionally vigilant, to be able to spot the slightest
clues about suspicious people.
“Look, think
of it as a numbers game. If terrorists are zeroes, and
the public are the other numbers, you want to isolate
the zeroes. You need to arrange the public so that
there’s only one zero in a whole line of law-abiding
people, so that there’s only one in a whole square--”
“Hang on,” I
said. “Now you’re doing it. That’s a sudoku you’re
talking about. Why do you think the world’s like one of
these games?”
She studied
me for a bit, and I wondered if her interest was purely
professional. I could certainly see why Stratton might
get himself in trouble over her. “Tell me,” she said,
“have you seen the sequel to Strain Your Brain!?”
“I have,” I
said. “Professor Stendahl gave me one himself.” I
couldn’t resist this little boast: she wasn’t the only
one who mixed with famous people.
“Let me tell
you a secret,” she said. “Entirely off the record?” I
nodded. “John Stratton had some input into the sequel.
He had discussions over how the game could better
provide the skills necessary for life in the
twenty-first century. Have you tried the Spot The
Difference game yet?”
“Hardly,” I
said. “I don’t have time for--what’s the
word?--unimportant things.”
She nodded.
“Have a go now. You’ll see.” I took my copy out, and
went through the menu to the game. “It looks easy,
but the point is that people are learning to see when
things are wrong. If you can find the differences
between two dogs, you can tell the difference between a
terrorist and a law-abider.”
Once again I
felt that the game was beneath me, but I had a go and I
got it sorted. Finding the last difference was the real
problem--one of the dogs had a different pattern on its
socks but I didn’t see that for some time.
“That was
easy,” I said proudly. “And you reckon I’ll be able to
tell who’s a terrorist now?”
“You should
certainly find it easier,” she said. “Now do you see
why John Stratton is so interested in the game?”
“I suppose
he needs to tell who’s a terrorist more than the rest of
us,” I said.
She paid for
the coffee and left soon after, but I thought I’d get in
touch with her again tomorrow. I could tell she fancied
me.
*
When I got
home I just put the telly on. I didn’t have another
look at the game--I reckon you need to let go a bit when
you’ve had a hard day. But whatever channel I had on, I
still kept finding this stuff about the election. And
it was strange--I didn’t notice at first, I wasn’t
really watching but I’d left the telly on while I had
the kettle on, but that Stratton bloke was still talking
in terms of the Prof’s game. There was one time when he
was going on about maths--he was talking about how the
policies of the other parties didn’t add up, and he was
doing all these clever things about numbers. There was
a lot about how “if peace is to be the result, and
terrorists are one of the problems, what do you have to
add to it to get the result?” Which just made me think,
that’s another of the puzzles on the Brain game. I
switched it on again just to prove it. I even did one
of the problems just to show I still could, it took me a
while but that was just because it was so late. I knew
I was getting better because the second game was telling
me so.
The other
guy in the election, Michael Benton, was talking much
more normally. He even had a go at Stratton for being
hooked on this game, but that was a mistake because it
was so popular. They had some members of the public on
afterwards and they were saying how they used to like
him, but since they’d been doing this game their IQs had
gone up and now they knew he was talking rubbish.
I still
liked him actually! I hadn’t made my mind up who I was
going to vote for, and I reckon that’s a sign of
intelligence, when you think about each thing when it
comes rather than just supporting someone slavishly. So
I don’t think there was any sort of conspiracy going on,
it wasn’t like the game made you suddenly support
Stratton or anything daft like that.
But it was
still odd. I thought back to earlier on, when I hadn’t
been so clever, and I’d thought there was something not
quite right. I thought that I should be able to work it
out now, but it still wouldn’t come. So I decided to
sleep on it. My brain needed a rest anyway.
***
I didn’t go
into the office the next day. I reckoned I needed to go
and have another word with the Prof, and anyway you
don’t want to be stuck in an office when the weather’s
good. I walked to the tube, and although I was looking
around to see if anyone looked like a terrorist, I
couldn’t see anything. I didn’t think I would mind you,
I thought that girl was just being daft, they don’t go
wandering around with guns in their hands.
So I walked
back through that college campus and quite frankly some
of them looked a bit dodgier this time. Some of them
were hanging around in groups talking, and you had to
wonder what they were talking about since it all seemed
to be private. And there was one group of foreigners
who looked a bit suspicious. I’m not prejudiced or
anything, I reckon it’s disgusting how some Muslims are
treated, the good ones, but it’s always them when
there’s some sort of a terrorist attack isn’t it? The
bad ones are just giving the good ones a bad name. So I
thought, I’ll just make a note of it for now, because if
I keep playing this game I might get better at seeing
what’s what and then I’ll know if I should report them
or anything.
Anyway, I
got to the Prof’s office, but he was off teaching, so I
had to wait. I still wanted to think, I still had this
idea at the back of my mind that I was trying to bring
up to the front. But it wouldn’t come, so I had another
go on his Spot The Difference game.
So the Prof
turns up after half an hour, and who’s he got with him?
Only John Stratton, hasn’t he! So I thinks, how’s he
got away from all that media and everything? But then I
remember that he’s got something to do with this new
game, and I think, yeah, I should be interviewing both
of them. See, I reckon I’ll be able to catch him out
better now, I’ll notice more things and I’ll know if
he’s lying. So I’m “I didn’t expect to see you here, Mr
Stratton,” and he’s like, “I thought I should see how
our subject’s doing,” and I’m like, “your subject?
That’s like politics, yeah?” But they both just smile
and we go in their office.
“So, how are
you feeling?” asks the Prof, and I says, “yeah, I got to
hand it to you, Prof. I didn’t think that game would
work but I reckon my IQ’s gone through the roof.” And
then that Stratton bloke’s smiling, and he goes, “yeah
we thought we were right about this. As soon as we
realised that your brain can be trained to be more
intelligent, we thought, it could go the other way too.”
But I didn’t
get what he was on about, so I says, “surely you just
want to make people brainier?” and he looks at me, and
he’s like, “Politics is a funny old game,” and my ears
prick up then because this is the kind of thing I’m
listening for, so I’m like, “what do you mean?”
“Think of an
election as a set of tangled lines,” he says. “You’ve
got the voter at one end, holding the fishing-rod, and
all the parties are at the end of the line, so you’ve
got to trace the right line, to find out who they’re
going to vote for--”
“That’s what
you keep doing,” I says, and I think I’m onto something
now, that idea at the back of my mind wants to come
out. “You keep talking about life as if it’s one of
these brain strain games. But that’s just daft, I know
you’re like teaching skills and that but that don’t mean
that life’s a word search does it?” And then I sees
this idea, and I says, “but then if you’re training
people to think in a certain way, then when you start
talking like that, they’re going to think along with
you.” And I don’t know where these words are coming
from but I let them out anyway. “You’re using these
games to lay the foundations of how you want them to
think. Then when you deliver one of your speeches, your
audience is already halfway there. They simply follow
the content of your arguments, as if it’s a track that’s
already been worn down in their brains.” What I’m
saying sounds preposterous, but I had had at first hand
a demonstration of how pernicious the effects of
Professor Stendahl’s game could be. “The mental skills
you claim to be imparting are actually the preliminaries
to accepting your political arguments.”
I looked at
the two in front of me, the Professor of Psychology and
the politician, and saw everything with a clarity that
chilled me utterly. I had reviewed this device, and
thought it a harmless entertainment. Now I realised
that in fact I had stumbled on something far more
sinister.
An even more
unsettling thought hit me as I looked down at my own
copy of Strain Your Brain! 2.0. I’d used this on
several occasions since first meeting Professor Stendahl.
Had it been controlling or influencing my own mind?
“And if that’s the purpose of the first game, how much
worse is the sequel?”
The two men
looked at each other, worriedly. Then John Stratton put
on his politician’s smile. “Tell me, have you actually
played the Tangled Lines game?”
“No, I’ve
been too busy with the Spot The Difference,” I said.
The words jarred as I said them, and I realised how I’d
been wasting my time with trivialities.
“Just give
it a go now,” he said.
So I took up
the stylus and had a go at tracing the lines. It was
harder than it looked, and the pen kept going off the
lines and the game made a funny noise. So I says, “this
is too hard,” and that Stratton bloke, he’s like, “nah,
you keep at it, I’ll change the difficulty level,” and
then he turns it up but i keeps going at it i do, and
when i finally does it i gives a whoop and says there
you are, thats me im a genius now
and stratton
he says yeah you are pal your sorted now i bet your glad
you got this game so now do you see why its like the
vote
and im like
yeah i see youve got to get to the right ballot box
havent you and he says yeah, thats right but youve got
to make sure you vote for the right person as well and i
says hang on your one of them people arnt you your
standing in it
and he says
yeah thats right and then the prof starts talking and he
just talks funny uses loads of long words like hes beter
than anyone else and i says you sure your a prof not a
puff? but stratton says look you dont want them
terrists running the world do you?
and i says
no that’s right you sort them mulems muslems out
and ill vote for you mate and he shakes my hand and i
leaves then. and outside theres all them foregn
people. i know theres some people say there ok but they
must be thick or something everyone knows their just
trying to blow us up.
then later
that night stratons on telly and hes going on about reds
and blues again and i says yeah thats right you tell
them pal but then i turns it over cos its just boring
and on the other side theres some girls with no tops on.
END
|